Sixth Sense Requirements

Tema en '[Archived]: N3 Rules' iniciado por LankyOgreBP, 14 Mar 2019.

  1. LankyOgreBP

    LankyOgreBP Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    29 Dic 2017
    Mensajes:
    230
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    183
    I know this has come up and been explained, but I'm having trouble finding any direct reference. I need to go ahead and bookmark whatever answer so I can pull it up on game.

    The Requirements of Sixth Sense are as follows:
    REQUIREMENTS

    In order to use Sixth Sense L1,

    • An enemy must be inside the user's Zone of Control.
    • That enemy must declare an Attack against the user.
    So, I have a chasseur in camo. A model declares a short skill and walks into ZOC and I hold. The other model then declares another move or declares an attack at an entirely different model. Can the chasseur respond?
    I feel like I've seen a lot of reference to using the chasseur to declare off of the second skill, but the requirements make it look like the chasseur has to be targeted.
     
  2. Mahtamori

    Mahtamori Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    23 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    12.066
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    15.369
    You have to let your opponent know that your marker/trooper is using Sixth Sense to delay their ARO towards the model activated by the order.

    If you just hold your ARO, you've forfeited it.

    The requirements of Sixth Sense are misrepresentative of some of the things you can do with the skill.
     
    A inane.imp y FatherKnowsBest les gusta esto.
  3. LankyOgreBP

    LankyOgreBP Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    29 Dic 2017
    Mensajes:
    230
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    183
    How do I defend this in a game though? Is there a specific link or reference? It’s pretty hard to argue with the direct rules in the PDF/book, but the second “requirement” really only sometimes applies.

    Me “I use sixth sense to delay.”
    Them “I move here.”
    Me “I attack with my flamethrower”
    Them “sixth sense says enemy must declare an attack.”
    Me “.......”

    What’s the direct reason/justification/argument for being allowed to declare something?
     
  4. ijw

    ijw Ian Wood aka the Wargaming Trader. Rules & Wiki
    Infinity Rules Staff Warcor

    Registrado:
    25 Abr 2017
    Mensajes:
    7.351
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    14.838
    You point them towards the examples.

    http://infinitythewiki.com/en/Sixth_Sense#Example_of_Sixth_Sense_L1_vs_a_rear_attack

    "Had the Alguacil declared a further Movement instead of a BS Attack, the Maakrep Tracker would have been able to declare an ARO against an unseen active enemy inside her Zone of Control (Change Facing)."

    That's a clear example that the Sixth Sense trooper gets their delayed ARO, without having been Attacked as the active trooper declared Move-Move.

    In fact, the main part of that example also reinforces it:

    "An Alguacil, in his Active Turn, declares the first Short Skill of his Order: Moving towards a Maakrep Tracker with her back turned, keeping outside her LoF. The Alguacil is now inside the Tracker's Zone of Control so she uses her Sixth Sense L1 Special Skill to delay her ARO, waiting for the Alguacil to make his move.
    The Alguacil declares a BS Attack as the second Short Skill of his Order. Now that she is the target of an Attack, the Maakrep Tracker uses her Sixth Sense L1 to react as if she was facing towards the Alguacil. The Tracker chooses to declare a BS Attack so the Order is resolved with a Face to Face BS Roll between both soldiers."

    If delaying required being the target of an Attack, the Maakrep wouldn't be able to delay 'against' the Move - the active trooper would have to target them with the first Skill of the Order.
     
  5. Robock

    Robock Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    24 Nov 2017
    Mensajes:
    1.246
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    858
    the example given for how to apply the rule in an actual game :

    Note in the example how the Tracker was able to delay using Sixth Sense in response of an Alguacil that was simply moving along minding his own business, not attacking the Tracker in any way. Also note that had the Alguacil decided to Move+Move, the Tracker would still be able to declare an ARO after having delayed it.

    Example of Sixth Sense L1 vs a rear attack
    An Alguacil, in his Active Turn, declares the first Short Skill of his Order: Moving towards a Maakrep Tracker with her back turned, keeping outside her LoF. The Alguacil is now inside the Tracker's Zone of Control so she uses her Sixth Sense L1 Special Skill to delay her ARO, waiting for the Alguacil to make his move.
    The Alguacil declares a BS Attack as the second Short Skill of his Order. Now that she is the target of an Attack, the Maakrep Tracker uses her Sixth Sense L1 to react as if she was facing towards the Alguacil. The Tracker chooses to declare a BS Attack so the Order is resolved with a Face to Face BS Roll between both soldiers.
    Had the Alguacil declared a further Movement instead of a BS Attack, the Maakrep Tracker would have been able to declare an ARO against an unseen active enemy inside her Zone of Control (Change Facing).

    edit: I was too slow :)
     
    A LankyOgreBP le gusta esto.
  6. LankyOgreBP

    LankyOgreBP Well-Known Member

    Registrado:
    29 Dic 2017
    Mensajes:
    230
    Me Gusta recibidos:
    183
    Thank you @ijw . Sometimes I know a rule exists, but can't remember the citation.
     
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation