This is a can of worms. At this point I'd suggest an official doc on how fireteams work. So many options now its just causing confusion.
Exactly this. So one time at band camp doesn’t mean anything.
Exactly this. As others pointed out it still gets the +3WIP. Which makes it even more confusing.
I have to agree, this FAQ entry does seem weird. But I also agree that the horse is already dead.
Really? Multiple posts after are asking for confirmation as there may be some confusion. With no reply. I'd consider that unconfirmed.
In that link it's unconfirmed...
I don't think it was ever confirm. The quote was regarding Operation rules. Which give you warning. Full rules do not. And as far as I'm aware...
OP updated.
Sorry, I meant linn the post from HellLois. Then I can link it in the answer.
Can you link the post and I'll add it in?
Yeah, jumping to death makes absolutely no sense to me. Even in a frenzy you'd know you're on top of a building. Mines though, you might not be...
I seem to remember the same answer of no. But with the old forum dead no way to check... So could be wrong.
Is it a FAQ then? Does an impetuous trooper have to fall to its doom if its a shorter path? I thought this was IJW confirmed as yes?
My issue with the xvisored Fireteam GL is exactly this. The spec fire short odds is negated by the fact you don't need to move to cover the entire...
If you land the FO...
Added Unmasking question.
It's an older code, but I'm not sure it checks out....
Course its not. Horribly worded. I was confused as it seemed to be confiremed. But as I say just a misunderstanding.
'the rule don't allow user to respond if there is no roll' reads exactly the opposite to me. But there you go. Normal service resumed.
That's what I thought. The bold text in Shangos post seemed to imply otherwise and was confirmed by IJW
