So when reading comlog, each bullet point at the top are independent set of points. For instance, supremacy states (paraphrased): *Dominate more zones each round, gain 2 objective points *hacked consoles at end of game are worth 1 objective point, max 3 Each bullet point are separate scoring and added as total to final score. However safe area has 4 bullet points + 1 classified worth 1. 2 of those bullet points are mutually exclusive. A player cannot dominate equal amount of zones as their opponent and dominate more. So 3 is the most from that. Its the consoles that is the problem. There is no statement in comlog saying controlling a console for 1 objective point each and controlling a console when your opponent controls 0 consoles for 2 points each are mutually exclusive. So with 2 separate bullet points not being exclusive and having no language of "instead" or the same bullet point to indicate its a change of the other scoring, each console is worth 3 (1 from controlling, 2 for still controlling it and opponent has none) objective points (12 total), 3 from zones, and 1 classified for 16 total. This should not exist. No other scenario has this massive of a scoring difference from the max of 10. This scenario's console scoring needs to be rewritten if I am not being a bonehead and overlooked something.
As you can see in the ITS missions PDF, this is a typo https://downloads.corvusbelli.com/infinity/organized-play/its-rules-season-12-en-v1.1.pdf
Would not have guessed that was what they were going for. Was expecting it went from 1 point per console to 2 per. Not just 2 flat. Cheers! Do you know the process to report it to have it changed?