I have 3 scenario want to ask about cover from above building. I want to ask which one is valid and which one is not 1. Normal above cover (in the book) <- this definitly valid since it from the book 2. If shoot person in low level but not that much different (his head was above enemy feet) is this valid. Since he can draw lof from his head and see enemy entire body. 3. This is a little tricky similar scene as number2 (shooter head was above enemy feet) but enemy building have extend wall edge but enemy also not contact with that edge. My question is "Is extend edge consider same building structure as a building. which mean enemy consider contact with that edge already?" what do you guy think?
1 is cover, as per the book 2 is no cover, because you can see the entire silhouette. 3 is no cover as they are not in contact with the part of the scenery that is blocking LoF. Theoretically 3 could be argued as being cover by saying that the wall is the same piece of scenery as the roof, but that way lies madness and it's advised against.
