Impetuous and Vaulting

Discussion in '[Archived]: N3 Rules' started by inane.imp, Jul 9, 2018.

  1. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,179
    An Irmadhino uses its Extremely Impetuous order, moves 3.5" and then hits a low (<S2) 3mm wall. The Irmadhino has insufficient movement to vault the wall and end on the far side so their final position will be in B2B with the obstacle on the near side.

    For the purposes of AROs: does the Irmadhino only move 3.5" stopping at the last legal position?Or, does it move 4", vault onto the obstacle and then warp back to the last legal position?
     
  2. ijw

    ijw Ian Wood aka the Wargaming Trader. Rules & Wiki
    Infinity Rules Staff Warcor

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Messages:
    7,353
    Likes Received:
    14,845
    I would think that would be equivalent to stopping for special terrain. Apart from anything else, moving 'onto' and then back 'off' the wall would be a longer move than the trooper's MOV value.
     
    daboarder and inane.imp like this.
  3. Spleen

    Spleen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2017
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    414
    Yeah I'm with IJW here, the most sane thing is to lump it into the "terrain that stops a movement short" clause even though RAW it's hard to justify

    edit: with the caveat, if sliding along the barrier the final half an inch does result in being closer to the target model, you do that, even though the most direct route was to vault.
     
  4. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,179
    That was my original POV as well, but then I second guessed myself as being gamey to avoid taking a Riot Grrl linked ML ARO to the face. In the end I went with option 2. It did not end well for our friendly neighbourhood arms dealer.
     
  5. Anonymous

    Anonymous Guest

    What about, being on top of the wall but place the trooper beside the area it cannot traverse? Like with climbing skills where your mov value is not enough to surmount or descend completely? The dude is considered to be on the wall even if the rules ask you specifically to place the trooper beside the point where it is climbing.

    I mean does the guy fulfill all the requirements for such a thing, or is the rule about the base's width that prevents it?
     
  6. Arkhos94

    Arkhos94 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    1,584
    Likes Received:
    1,515
    If you cannot vault to go through the wall because you don't have enough movement left, shouldn't you be forced to use all your remaining movement to go around the wall (as far as you can) instead of stopping without completing your movement ?
     
  7. inane.imp

    inane.imp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    6,040
    Likes Received:
    7,179
    No. The rules are explicit.

    Edit: disregard, I read that as a wall you’d have to climb in the next order.

    It gets weird: you only find out that you can’t Vault after you declare the movement along the shortest path (that requires a vault).

    In this case sliding along the low-wall would have actually moved the Irmmdhino away from his target, in which case it’s absurd to do that.
     
  • About Us

    We are a company founded in 2001 in Cangas (Spain), and devoted to design and manufacture games and figures. Our main product, Infinity the Game, was born with the ambition to satisfy the most demanding audience, offering the best quality.

     

    Why are we here?

     

    Because we are, first and foremost, players.

  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation