So with nothing to show for it you're still sure he'd drop a ruling that the rules are actually meant to contradict themselves. Right. It's useless for this thread anyway as the example doesn't actually contradict the rule, the example in question just crams several combinations into a single situation.
Pleaso no more! Leave the protheion situation alone. At that time rules were in contradiction with example, bit the rules have been changed since then, so don't ever mention that ever again, please.