Yeah I always do it in competitive play, especially with USARF where I can have 10 camo markers + a paratrooper, but people are generally pretty...
If it's written down during deployment and let aside in a folded sheet of paper until then, then it's pretty easy to verify.
The problem is that since the fact that troopers' points costs are described as hidden information is expressed clumsily in the rules means that...
"I'm deploying a Swiss Guard right here. What are you gonna do about it, punk?"
The people pushing for noninteractive scenarios have more in common with "grimdork" than those against the braindead button-pushing.
The people who want to play Agricola should just go play Agricola.
Do we now?
Not if my opponent is on their game.
Criticize @Tourniquet, not me. He brought it up.
No, dude. Button pushing is boring. FtF rolls/interaction are actually interesting.
I wouldn't go that far. But it needs to be costed appropriately, and shouldn't work against nonlethal ammo/E/M.
He also doesn't die to a random knife crit like a lot of other CC specialists do.
Well, as a counterpoint, they didn't have Shock immunity in their old profiles.
Yup. Or Total Immunity on Uberfallkommando - no big deal. On Karakuris- huge deal, and should cost much more.
This is exactly what I'm feeling. If there's any warcors reading this who talk to CB on the regular, pass it up the chain...
Eh, I mean, the expansions seem to have four-ish new characters; A Morat, an Umbra, a Shas, and some other grab bag character (Bit, Ko Dali,...
We'd want four, optimally, and hitting the different CA races would be nice.
I still wish we had some Combined Army heroes for the reverse experience ;_;
There's a few of those already.
You might have noticed how the line infantry in CA is all 14 points. I don't think that's gonna change; I think it's more likely we start getting...