Dude, you're imagining connections where there are none. I can't recall ever having interacted on here or anywhere with Pierzasty, especially as according to his profile I live half a world away from him. I was just pointing out that you were incorrectly interpreting a common undirected phrase as a personal threat.
If all you're gonna focus on is anything bad and not acknowledge the rest of what I'm saying that you are part of the problem because ypure trying to get rid of me pointing out the bad behavior others. It's not just me and it wasnt my behavior that started this. Wake up!
You and others are trying to make shit up saying koni was asking a question. He wasnt. So get out with your BS
Look man it's clear your perception and mine are not aligned, the obvious reason for this is because you are not on the negative end of this favoritism.
He *was* merely asking a question, one that the context clearly indicates was being asked of all of us (Vds. vs Vd.), not any of us individually. Straining to read it any other way seems a bit malafide. And Pierzasty’s reply was, again, simply a restating of a years-old internet trope.
He was not asking a question, he was describing an experience. Stop lying to defend your views and your friend.
@Koni @psychoticstorm get in here already and just tell everyone it's a hard cap now, zero tolerance. Unless you do play favorites and not jumping in on this only exemplifies I've been right all along. These protected people dont only badger me, they're the reason why new players dont use the forums.
Threatens people, thinks CB has some totem pole conspiracy, is constantly rude to other posters and staff, tells people to 'watch your mouth', says CB staff don't do their jobs and thinks that people asking him to stop this behavior are attacking him, then tags CB staff to help him continue being toxic. Not sure if this is going to turn out the way you think....
So we're going to a week-on/week-off model with all this, then? Look, I love trash, but there comes a point where it really starts to impact the rest of your community, and creates a space that is inherently un-inviting and gives a poor image to new audiences as well. If certain individuals can't be bothered to keep their shit together for less than 24 hours after their temporary bans expire, and in fact grow even more agitating after the fact, perhaps that's a sign. As much as I'd love to revel in the shitpostery of it all, that's really not what this forum is supposed to be.
I know that this discussion stops here, as we said in the end of the week we welcome back forum members that have been temporarily banned, as long as they are willing to keep the bare minimum of forum behavior, act in a cool and civilized manner, temporary bans can be issued and reissued and will be issued and reissued if this behavior continues.
You literally just did a bad lip reading for all the events that have taken place. Literally you could twist things up more but you did a good job already of trying to lie about how all this has gone.
Normally I try to stay out of forum drama, but Pierzasty's statement is a common internet observation, not a targeted threat. People are nicer in person and meaner online because there is safety in anonymity and separation from the self. If one is a jerk at their local shop, people will know and possibly call them out on it, maybe face more severe repercussions based on their actions. You are obligated to be more polite by society. Online it's different, if someone is a jerk on a forum or Twitter, they are just one of thousands of faceless jerks lost in the crowd. There's rarely serious consequences of what we say or do, because people hide behind avatars and pseudonyms. Maybe "get punched" is a slightly aggressive and comedic way to phrase "consequences of one's actions", but I don't think you should interpret that as him threatening to punch you over a tiny internet forum. He's just talking about why people are meaner online than in person.
So you continue to ignore the repetitive prodding of other, the implication from pierzasty that someone should be punched in the face, koni trying to single people out, striker telling nada to fuck off. This has been going on for far too long and clearly since koni thought it was okay to single anyone and after the fact pierzasty wanted to say someone should have been punched in the face, then it's your guy's fault anything continues. Take responsibility for your own bad actions and get on other peoples cases and not just the few who have pointed out what you did wrong.
Dude, you're seriously gonna ignore people were trying to make excuses and lies about it, saying kobi was asking a question when he wasnt. It's not just one person or one thing it's a cascade of bullshit, that's why I want a zero tolerance policy, I dont anyone getting away with any shit ever again. You talk about people being assholes in person is rare, I guarantee these people would try to lie nearly as much because then they actually do cause the problems they complain about. They wanna talk about getting punched in the face like they're bad asses but then cry wolf when someone calls them out on it. Telling someone they have internet courage and to start a fight and detail discussions without willing to back it up is the cowardly thing to do and just shows they had no conviction in their original argument to begin with, they should have never tried to imply anyone was a coward from the get go. Yet the moderators here dont do shit for the majority of transgressors. So for the fucking love of god, dont make up excuses for anyone else here just cause you want some peace. Some of us here actually want all transgressions to stop, not just bigger ones.l because the little ones will always lead to bigger ones.
Listen to yourself you clown, you love trash and revel in the shitpostery, you're part of the problem, you and others who talk like you are the ones who start this shit and cry like a baby when people snap back at you.
I do believe this is an exaggeration and misattribution of a target to a post that is generic and targets nobody in particular, I can see the debate if this could have been worded in a more polite way, we have an example above, but to consider it a targeted threat one needs to assume they are the target, I think this is not a valid course of action. I feel the fact we allow a card blanch for returning forum members is an opportunity that returning forum members should utilize and not waste it. And a last reminder for the argument to stop.
So that's it, more excuses for everyone else, you didnt even address anything beside pierzasty and direct it back at me. If you don't talk about things then that makes you untrustworthy, that's why I say favoritism.
