i heard that in a couple years they can come back and another sectorial would be shelved in its place(per CB's SKU announcement vid on ASA). but still get on going rules for them. also heard it is more to do with overall sales numbers not games. might be wrong but what i digested from past vids and threads.
What an odd statement, you're either saying that the data has been cooked to an absolute minimum, or that you're a philistine who eats overcooked steak and therefore clearly has no sense or taste?
Wouldn't that be the opposite. The phrase makes sense if hes eats steaks that are well done. This implys the data is overcooked.
If he eats his steaks rare then implies that the data is also, at a minimum, rare. It only really implies that the data is super cooked if he eats his steak *shudder* well done.
This data just seems wrong. When I play MO I feel like I'm always missing a limb and I only get to pick which limb it is, and even so unless I get a really good matchup it's an uphill battle due to how one dimensional it is. When playing ASA I never feel like I'm missing options, one standard list can take on almost any mission and matchup while feeling like a competitive army.
The data is based on outcome only, and should lead to RCCA, but doesn’t indicate root cause in itself. It’s also an average, which has problems of its own. Single extreme outliers can have outsized effect on the calculation. Basically this is just a health check. Is the range between highest and lowest within acceptable limits? Based on the presentation, it appears the answer is “yes.”
