Sorry if I end up sounding a bit bombastic / pompous / self-important / desperate, but I have two requests for Corvus Belli regarding the assembly of miniatures. Not a cranky criticism, but an honest appeal I have as a fan and a customer. Request #1: The new bases I can understand why CB updated the design of the bases - and, in theory, the ready-made LoF markers are something I'd really support. I spent way too much time marking the bases manually... That said, in practice, the new bases cause more trouble than it's worth. Why? The way the minis are designed, they don't always align with the bases' LoF markers. So, to position the mini correctly, you have to either remove the bar at the botton of the models, or cut your own slot in the bases. Both options are tiresome and time-consuming. Also, with the two slots built into the bases and multiple plastic "dots" covering the bottom, glueing magnets to the underside is really tricky... And it's important to me, because I store and transport my minis in magnetized cases or boxes. Being unable to put a magnet at the bottom of a base makes such a base useless for me. The old bases fit the 2mm-thick magnets *perfectly*. The new ones... not sure I'll find magnets that will fit them? Because all of this, I'd love for CB to consider going back to the old base design - or, at least, to include both types of bases in their products. Request #2: Miniature design Let me say it first: I believe that, overall, Infinity miniatures are *awesome*. One of the best miniature lines I've seen across the wargaming hobby. They are a thing of beauty when ready, even if unpainted. That said, I'd really like CB to consider improving the way the miniatures need to be assembled. If I may refer to CB's competition, Games Workshop: one thing I really appreciate about their miniatures is that are quite easy to assemble. Their modern models are often quite elaborate, they come in multiple parts - and yet, they are designed in a way that makes fitting these parts together intuitive and easy. Sensible contact surfaces, shaped slots and grooves that make it impossible to fit the parts wrong if you're paying attention to the instructions... Meanwhile, Infinity minis tend to have joints without obvious positioning, parts in the vein of forearms that need to be glued on to a 1mm-wide contact surfaces etc. Sometimes, assembling these minis can be really frustrating! Especially as the minis are small - and many of them have the "two hands on a gun" poses. Such a pose requires a mini to be assembled very precisely, if the pose is to come together neatly. The current design of Infinity minis doesn't help with that. So, my big request for CB: can you consider making your assembly system a bit more like GW's? It'd really help those of us who don't have super-dexterous fingers. I must admit that assembling GW's models (after you get through cutting the parts out of their sprues) is quick and easy... honestly, a pleasure. Meanwhile, as much I as like Infinity, I must say that assembling CB minis is, basically, a big stress. When I set out to assemble even a single mini, I end up going tense and wondering: will it work this time around? Or will end up spending an hour or two trying to unsuccessfully glue a three-part model? It *did* happen. And so, here are my two requests to the (overall great and friendly) company that is CB: solve the problems the new bases cause. And work on the mini assembly system. Please, guys! Honestly, consider these two matters... They'd seriously improve my enjoyment of the game - and not only mine, I suspect.
I was wondering what's wrong with the new bases since I had no issues with them at all. It took me a moment to remember that I saw off the bars during cleanup. It really takes one hobby saw and like 30 seconds per mini to get rid of them. Try it.
I consider building and converting miniatures my biggest pleasure when engaging in this hobby, so here are my 2 cents: 1. I always cut off the bar on the bottom of the miniature. I've done it differently in the past, also coming from GW metal sculpts where the pre-slotted bases make it seem an intuitive thing to do, but boy I will never get back to that. Stuffing the inevitable gaps between the metal bar and the base is a much bigger hassle than just clipping off the bar and filing the soles flat. Also, with the bar cut off, you can alter the miniatures pose easily by carefully applying pressure to the legs. Sometimes the angle is just not quite right or you want the stance of the miniture to be a bit more "open", so this enables you to achieve just that, while the bar pretty much prevents it. 2. The thing about the magnets I can confirm. I had to switch to slimmer magnets due to the protrusions under the base. Prevously, I just glued the magnets on, with the 2mm variants fitting just fine, but now I do use a bit of modelling putty as a buffer for the magnets. Then I turn the base around magnets down and press it on a flat surface to make sure all magnets are level. 3. Miniature design is a difficult matter and I'm sure CB do consider optimization of assembly when designing new sculpts. So far very few Infinity miniatures have given me actual problems (hello, Tuareg sniper lady), but then again I consider myself to be pretty handy with this stuff and I also have small fingers, so I can totally see people having issues assembling certain kits. Some of the more recent kits have tried different systems (like the Daiyokai, the Zulu Cobra Jammer and the Taagma Sniper), but they also produced a whole set of new issues where pieces just wouldn't fit together perfectly and leave ugly gaps. I still prefer the classic legs/torso with detached arms and possibly head, because it's nice and simple and allows for easy conversions. Sometimes, a head swap is all you need to "fix" a miniature or give it your own little twist, so I like it when those prominent features are seperate pieces. Same goes for weapon arms, where a bit of bending can often produce a more satisfying result.
I usually cut the bar down so that it results in 2 spikes on the bottom of the feet. Then you can make nice small holes in the base to glue those spikes into and be a little more stable. That said, mostly now I'm just getting some green stuff to fill the top of the base and stick the mini to that, no real intricate patterns or whatnot, but provides a more flexible base than cutting into a plastic base. Not perfect jobs, obviously, since the green stuff doesn't fill the base perfectly, and you can see where I should have trimmed a bit more off the foot before spiking it. I may at some point go back and change my bases on the O12 guys, but meh, it's perfectly functional as is. That said, I haven't gotten around to messing with the magnets yet, but certainly the bar doesn't change anything and I can always trim the underside's stuff to make room for magnets since nothing major extends below.
Hmmm. So, what kind of tool do I need to remove the bottom bar safely? I have a hobby knife, some files and a sprue cutter. I suppose none of these would work on something so thick, though... You guys mentioned a hobby saw - what is that, actually? As for magnets - I guess they are the smallest problem, although I'm not sure if the magnet's size / thickness impacts its magnetic "strength"? Also, I have quite a few of 2mm magnets and I'm not looking forward to buying another bag of different ones. These things are cheap, but not *that* cheap. As for the assembly - I don't know, it all seems completely random with CB minis. There are some that I feared getting to, but I managed to assemble easily (the female Daylami from the Hassasin starter, for example, or the Naffatun). The heavier guys like Al Fasids or Kriza Borats are usually very elegantly designed. But there are some horror stories, like the female Tuareg Sniper, Leila Sharif or my personal nightmare, the Icestorm Grenzer. It took me three attempts to assemble him, I literally wasted *hours* on him (weeks, actually, if you count the time I had to waste on bathing him in a solvent to remove the glue before trying again)... It really shouldn't be like that. With current Games Workshop minis, you just cut them out, you wash them, you glue them. It's a few minutes spent on a single mini, usually - and no stress, just satisfaction with building cool models. Even the more complicated models don't cause trouble: for example, it only took me about 30 minutes to assemble the recently-released Ogroid Myrmidon, a really beautiful, complex model made of 13 separate parts. In other words: there *is* a reason I'm moving at assembling my Stormcast and Skaven armies with relative speed, while my Infinity armies are growing at a definitely slower pace... Not saying this to bash CB with their competition - just showing an example that assembling minis can be less a hassle than CB minis often require.
Same clipper you use to cut plastic sprues can be used to clip the pewter tabs on CB minis. Its what I use. Then I cut the excess. And file flat. Same tools I use for GW minis.
CB assembly has also come a long way since Icestorm and Red Veil, compare something like the recent Druze or Wildfire boxes and it's night and day. A lot of people also struggle because: 1) They use the wrong glue, or glue that's too old. A small amount of good gel superglue (like gorilla glue green tip) will quickly hold a piece in place, you can also use an accelerant to make it hold immediately. 2) People don't realise that you can bend metal pieces, and that sometimes pieces get bent in transit. My JSA Daiyokai didn't fit properly at first, so I gently bent the two large pieces back into shape until they fit, the same with models holding guns in two hands, sometimes you need to gently and carefully bend them into place. They'll never be as easy to assemble as GW models because they're metal, you need a different set of skills, but I can crank out Infinity minis pretty quickly and easily now.
What I do is take my hobby knife and press it down on the bar next to the foot and rock the mini back and forth until it slices through. The blade is thin enough that it doesn't really move the legs very much... unlike my clippers, which tend to bend the legs a lot when clipping the bar. That said, you can use the clippers on the other side once the bar is cut once. Then I use the tabs that are left as pins in the base. A hobby/jeweler's saw is just a small saw with very thin blade, but I don't think it's required if you don't already have one. As for putting minis together... I think CB has greatly improved with their newer sculpts and they seem to be even simpler with what they showed with Defiance.
Have someone print this for you : https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2267335 it should be cheap as chips as they say ( really it costs cents to make this thing, so anyone charging more than a dollar for it is an asshole IMO ). You will never again have problems with marking LoF. I threw away all the new style bases with LoF premarked because of the issues you mentioned. I knew this is going to be an issue as soon as they announced these new bases, without having product in hand.
I used to use clippers and hobby knife to turn the bar into pegs, and it's definitely fine, but I was so much happier when I switched to a saw. I find it faster, easier, more accurate, and no worry that the clippers will push the metal apart and bend the legs out of shape. Google "razor saw" on Amazon and you'll find a good one for under $10.
Ooooooh... <3 Thank you! As for CB improving - well, I look at the Asura Hacker and I despair. One of the arms has a 1mm joint!
Sprue cutters work fine, the metal is pretty soft, but it may dull the edge after a while. I just used some wire cutters I had around. Just cutting it in a v shape under the foot and maybe trimming the point down. To remove the entire thing, just cut it in pieces to remove the main lug, then remove the bit under there until you can just file it.
A lot of the minis are also sort of ball and socket, so I use baking soda in the socket and a little super glue on the ball and the bond is instant and strong. So long as you don't mis align something during assembly. :)
I really like the markers on the new bases, but it is really annoying how most models are posed facing diagonally and the slots are an offset cross. I've been a big critic of the new assembly system. Even if it is more efficient. It's become a nightmare to do weapon and head swaps. And arm swaps have largely become impossible. I've always used large sized nail clipers for sprues and taking little metals bits off, or recently clipping the bottom bar off on one foot.
My two cents here As other people here, I do my own bases and allways cut the labed below the miniatures feet. I also prefeer old bases because I want to preserve my way of putting the LoS, so I might end changing bases or buying bases from 3rd companies. I do not magnetize my bases, so I will not touch that topic. GW assembling is tricky. There are a lot of bad unions that need extra work with green stuff (or liquid one) if you want a good finish, and some of their models are falsely "multi option" since some time ago. I agree that CB assembling is not perfect, but is the best one in metal miniatures at the moment (while the way GW does it now is just a copy from the one from wyrd and KD:M, and is a direct result from doing it in plastic, if they were in metal, I'm pretty sure they would go CB's way)
I tried those small hobby saws with removable razor-like blades, but found them too fragile. Now I use the Army Painter hobby saw and I 100% recommend it. I've had it for around two years now and it's still working well.
Alternatively, something as simple as remembering that your models tend to be designed on a diagonal pose could have been utilized to avoid the necessity for people to have to add another step of cleanup.
I got some 5mmX1.5mm magnets, they fit perfectly in the little area there. One is enough to support the regular guys, though I put 2 (going diagonal from the fenced in spot) for some bigger guys just in case. Meh, I'll just put two in for all of them, just to be sure. They fit in any of the quarters, it's just easiest to put them in the fenced one since they snap in and are easy to glue from there.
Yeah, I agree with that. I realize that problem could be avoided by cutting off the bottom bar, but... it should've been obvious that this problem would appear. So, why create bases that would add yet another thing you need to do when assembling the minis? Why make things *harder* instead of *easier*? If CB really is committed to the LoF bases (and, again, in theory they are a nice idea), then why not just drop the bottom bar altogether? I admit I don't know that much about fine details of mini manufacturing, but as I said: I haven't had much trouble with GW minis lately. Also, I'm not sure why the material matters that much? Why would it be impossible for CB to design their minis like GW does, i.e. "cut" them in such ways that they would include grooves that guide you when putting pieces together, sensible contact surfaces etc. In fact, I feel like some of CB's minis would work better in *plastic* - all those minis with tiny joints really beg to be make of some light material susceptible to quick-working glue (i.e. plastic glue that really works faster than universal CA glue). Thanks! I'll be looking fot it, then. 1.5mm, then? Thanks, I've been wondering about that... Now I know what to look for.
I've had about 50/50 where I've been able to use the bottom bar in the slot. Unless you mean drop the bottom bar from the miniature entirely? I'd imagine that makes the casting and production of the miniatures slightly more difficult.